Subscription or Fee Access
Balancing Property Rights on Genetic Resources and Associated Traditional Knowledge: a Case Study from
Three property rights dominate the legal debate in governance of access to genetic resources and benefit sharing (ABS), namely sovereignty rights, ownership of traditional knowledge (TK) and intellectual property rights (IPRs). Whereas sovereignty rights -despite recognition in the Convention of Biological Diversity (CBD) - have been subjected to national legislations and other law instruments, IPRs have been regulated and protected at national, international and increasingly the bilateral level. Ownership of TK has been so far not dealt with in any international legal instruments and is often considered within the context of human rights as it relates to rights of indigenous peoples and local communities. Based on empirical data collected in Brazil in 2005, this paper argues that due to the differences in legal up-scaling of the ABS-related property rights and due to the lack of an enforcement mechanism for all involved property rights, the third objective of the CBD, namely the fair and equitable benefit sharing, cannot be achieved at the national level.
Convention on Biological Diversity; Access and benefit sharing; Bioprospecting, Traditional Knowledge, Indigenous Communities, Property rights; Brazil.
Disclaimer/Regarding indexing issue:
We have provided the online access of all issues and papers to the indexing agencies (as given on journal web site). It’s depend on indexing agencies when, how and what manner they can index or not. Hence, we like to inform that on the basis of earlier indexing, we can’t predict the today or future indexing policy of third party (i.e. indexing agencies) as they have right to discontinue any journal at any time without prior information to the journal. So, please neither sends any question nor expects any answer from us on the behalf of third party i.e. indexing agencies.Hence, we will not issue any certificate or letter for indexing issue. Our role is just to provide the online access to them. So we do properly this and one can visit indexing agencies website to get the authentic information. Also: DOI is paid service which provided by a third party. We never mentioned that we go for this for our any journal. However, journal have no objection if author go directly for this paid DOI service.