A Comparative Study of Evolutionary Algorithms
This article describes a comparative study of Evolutionary Algorithm with Guided mutation (EA/G) against Population-Based Incremental Learning (PBIL) and Compact Genetic Algorithm (CGA). Both PBIL and CGA are representatives of Estimation of Distribution Algorithms (EDAs), a class of algorithms which uses the global statistical information effectively to sample offspring disregarding the location information of the local optimal solutions found so far. On the other hand, EA/G uses global statistical information as well as location information to sample offspring. We implemented the algorithms to build an experimental setup upon which simulations were run. The performance of the algorithms was analyzed on numerical function optimization problems and standard genetic algorithm test problems in terms of solution quality and computational cost. We found that EA/G outperformed PBIL and CGA in attaining a good-quality solution, but both PBIL and CGA performed better than
EA/G in terms of computational cost.
Disclaimer/Regarding indexing issue:
We have provided the online access of all issues and papers to the indexing agencies (as given on journal web site). It’s depend on indexing agencies when, how and what manner they can index or not. Hence, we like to inform that on the basis of earlier indexing, we can’t predict the today or future indexing policy of third party (i.e. indexing agencies) as they have right to discontinue any journal at any time without prior information to the journal. So, please neither sends any question nor expects any answer from us on the behalf of third party i.e. indexing agencies.Hence, we will not issue any certificate or letter for indexing issue. Our role is just to provide the online access to them. So we do properly this and one can visit indexing agencies website to get the authentic information.thentic information.